Harold and Kumar bottomless party scene, unneccessary? - harold and kumar bottomless pool party
PG as in reality, were described-13, when this scene was not shown. They destroyed a funny movie, clothed in nakedness. Not to mention the girls have to shave.
Then I took my son to see, think it a funny movie, and was now full frontal nudity. Hello! they need this kind of filth in a movie comedy, is not it?
Monday, February 15, 2010
Harold And Kumar Bottomless Pool Party Harold And Kumar Bottomless Party Scene, Unneccessary?
2 comments:
What the hell is going on? It was a great scene. I understand your position, but if that is the only goal of the film to disappear all the intentions of the film. What do you expect a movie Harold and Kumar. And it was rated R. I personally would not my kids to R-rated or NC-17 rated film.
This is the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA):
* Focusing on the second sentence.
A: This means that the rating board has concluded that the film rated contains adult material. Parents are invited to learn more about the film before they get to see their children. An R may be assigned by, among other things, the use of film language, theme, violence, sex or drug presentation.
PS: DVD version may censcored and is suitable for minors.
Harold and Kumar, useless.
Well, if you do not want your child to see adult content, not necessarily the movies with adult ratings. I think it's common sense.
Anyway, why the human body is exposed as "undesirable"? Everyone is born naked. Some people die naked. What's so vulgar about nudity?
Anyway, now that I've seen, you have to teach him about sex. (Or he learns from his friends, his son, which can only lead to problems.)
EDIT: If I agree or disagree with you, I think you'll agree. Funny Movies do not need the nudity.
Post a Comment